.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to HailTheLeaf.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="HailTheLeaf:426696"]PatMeebles said: [QUOTE] And the vietnamese comparison for reporters killed conveniently leaves out a seriously important fact: there were barely any reporters in vietnam compared to Iraq. The first war, I think, that received widespread media coverage on the actual battleground was the first gulf war in the early 90's.[/QUOTE] Barely any reporters in Vietnam? you've gotta be kidding me, that war had more coverage in this country than the current war. [QUOTE]And stop saying 100,000's or Iraqis dead. It's not true. The lancet study (the only that's said, 100,000) said that it was 95% certain that the death toll was between 8,000 and 196,000. they chose 100,000 just because the number was in the middle. How... scientific.[/QUOTE] How do you know? I've heard 150,000. No one is keeping count because apparently dead people in other countries don't matter unless they're American. That statement was ment to be all inclusive anyways, not just Iraq, so I probably should've said millions... [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.009 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][