.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Man_of_the_Century.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Man_of_the_Century:428431"]ShadowSD said:[QUOTE]For instance, you correctly said that another reason the media doesn't report the war deaths because the public doesn't want to hear about it, but if you think about it, that's quite a self-reinforcing cycle that benefits goverment policy. The goverment gets people behind a policy before going to war, then once the war has gotten going soldiers start dying, but no one reports extensively on that because the public doesn't want to hear that the policy they embraced caused so much death. So the public never has to think too much about the deaths, and continues to support the war. Since they support the war, they don't want to be reminded of the deaths. Since they don't want to be reminded of the deaths, they support the war. Not a goverment controlled cycle by any means, but it works out great for them, doesn't it?[/QUOTE] You act like there are few people in the country that realize many good Americans are getting killed. You act like no one knows about it. Everyone does. They don't have to show bodies on the news, people still know hundreds, if not thousands of our boys are not coming home. If the government's plan was to cover up the amount of death that was going on over there, they did a horrible job. Like Pat said, there are not that many people that approve of the war. I read about the 6 soldiers too. I did say that there were a few fights that break out here and there, there's just not constant fighting anymore.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][