.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to ShadowSD.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="ShadowSD:429578"]I have to wonder what the statistical basis is for "roughly in the middle". Did they put a bunch of the middle numbers on a picture of a jackass and play pin the tail on the donkey, or is there some scientific basis they actually used that's being glossed over by the article? I would bet the second one. Which suggests to a reasonable person that the article glosses over one bit of reasoning, it might also gloss over the scientific basis for other aspects of the study as well. Also, if the study was biased as far as hoping to inflate the numbers more than they actually were, wouldn't a number they pick that's "roughly in the middle" be HIGHER than the middle (more than 101,000) instead of lower (98,000)? [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][