.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Murph MAST.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Murph%20MAST:1001735"][QUOTE="Conservationist:1001708"][QUOTE="brian_dc:1001659"]it would just be replaced with something that would turn out equally shitty[/QUOTE] Somehow -- The smart Christians I know come up with a smart version of Christianity that doesn't bother me or cause stupid problems. [/QUOTE] Someone's "smarts" and their "Christianity" cannot, by fact, be ubiquitous terms, as Christianity as a doctrine and a historical movement is wholly inaccurate, being so far removed from anything remotely historically relevant, as well as actual first-century Christianity itself. Pauline Christianity, Coptic, Greek Orthodox, whatever, have not survived well enough to even be noted as Christian. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][